Skip to content
Nordic Collective

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Triumph at The Game Awards — A New Category Could Fix That

Whenever a major honors show nears, one notices an outcry for the addition additional classifications to acknowledge unsung work and satisfy the passions of fans who have specialized interests.

A fellow writer previously argued for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are tabletop games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal remains most pressing and significant. Here's the proposal: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and it will always spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that film award organizations avoid this approach. However, it represents a necessary evil within the realm of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to compete fairly, genre categories are essential.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Prominent interactive entertainment events currently feature classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these classifications effectively encompass many game types, making space possible for numerous titles.

Not so for puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, all very different: structural challenges of one title, intense tile-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. Which classification works within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

  • One classic puzzle game got overlooked for anything in 2014
  • A different innovative game was excluded in 2019
  • A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment recently
  • Limited numbers of brain-teasers barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Frequently they represent small games, but the art of the puzzle game holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games stand as the most-played games worldwide continuing this trend for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with popular creative games claiming status as most purchased experience; it also contends as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks to the art of video games, while interacting with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Puzzle games wouldn’t have such difficulty. It would be easy to populate a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, since numerous excellent numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Brain-teaser creators function at the challenging frontier game development, creating some of essential manifestations of the video game form. Comparable to film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay 35 years.

SH
By

Sheila Henderson

Elara Vinter is a Scandinavian design expert and sustainability advocate, sharing insights on eco-conscious living and minimalist home styling.

Nordic Collective

Type to search articles.